GOV.UK
We are approaching the annual Low Carbon Vehicle (LCV) event and now the Connected Automated Mobility (CAM) event at Millbrook, which for various reasons prompts me to consider the question of speed limits and autonomous vehicles.
Whether we are drivers or not, almost everyone on the planet is aware of vehicle speed limits and most have been annoyed by some aspect relating to them – by others breaking the limit, limits being too low or just getting caught breaking them.
Assessing risk
Speed limits are there for good reasons, but the main one is that while we humans are good judges of relative risk, we are poor judges of absolute risk.
Some years ago, I was testing a Nissan Primera GT at high speed on the Millbrook bowl track. After an extended period of very high speed driving, I slowed to 100mph. It felt so slow that I could just get out and walk.
Not a good idea… but it illustrates the problem of the distortion of speed perception. That is the real reason we have speed limits.
Irrespective of what we individuals may consider to be a safe speed, a sign posted speed limit is simple to understand and probably a reasonable value with a reasonably acceptable risk associated with it.
A safe speed?
Of course, speed limits and their enforcement have been taken further to be the ultimate expression of safety, or lack of it. This is a pity because speed limits being treated as the safe speed is simplistic at best and dogmatically dangerous at worst.
This can be illustrated by thinking about the weather. In the UK, it is often overcast, sometimes raining and sometimes worse.
If a motorway speed limit is 70mph, is this meant for a sunny day, an overcast day, a rainy day or a foggy day? If it is only valid for the rare sunny, clear dry day, most of the time the limit will be too high, people will drive too fast and there will be too many accidents.
But this is not the case in practice – our overcast, rainy motorways are remarkably safe. Fog? That’s a totally different issue. Who would be mad enough to drive in thick fog at 70mph? (Unfortunately, some do... but perhaps because the labelled speed limit is still 70mph?).
Clearly, some common sense is called for, and fortunately, most of the time most drivers have enough of it not to have accidents. But not always.
Factors
Weather is one aspect, but there are many more:
- how heavily laden is the vehicle?
- how much tread is on the tyres?
- how hot and faded are the brakes?
- how fast are the driver’s reactions? (sleepy, drugged, drunk, etc.)
If you see someone driving slow on the motorway and drifting across lanes, they may be asleep or on the phone. They have slowed because they recognised the risk, to some extent, of being distracted.
So lots of things can affect what is a safe and reasonable speed for a vehicle. We can, and do make such judgements every day, and usually, we get it about right.
The self-driving car
Enter the autonomous car. It uses various sensors to determine what is going on around it and how to drive, including how fast to drive. Those sensors do not get used to driving at high speed, but have a defined, repeatable behaviour.
An autonomous vehicle can (and perhaps should) know how laden it is (suspension sensors), how much tread depth and adhesion is available. It could know how hot the brakes are.
It will know how quickly it can make decisions. In short, it should be able to calculate, in real time, what is the fastest safe speed for the vehicle and can provide a mathematical justification for that value(!). So, why should it have to comply with a crude approximation – a number on a stick by the road? Logically, it shouldn’t of course…..
Autonomous cars and speed
Speed kills, the adverts say. Wrongly of course. If it were that simple, everyone on the International Space Station would be dead several times over (17,150mph!). As any crash engineer knows, it is sudden changes of speed that kill. If all the traffic is travelling at the same speed, in the same direction, the absolute risk of a serious accident is very low indeed.
It is perturbations in the traffic flow which are the main problems – causing changes in speed and therefore accidents, which themselves cause sudden changes in speed, which can kill.
So, logically, an autonomous vehicle should most likely decide that the safest speed in a given traffic condition is the same speed as everyone else… even if that is above the posted limit.
But if there is no other traffic, why not let it decide for itself? If the sensing sophistication is sufficient, it is likely to be a far better real-time judge of what is instantaneously safe for that vehicle than you or I … or the person who put up the number on a stick beside the road many years ago… .
Contact
You can follow Richard on LinkedIn
You can go to the Innovate UK website
Find out more about our diversity and inclusion work here
You can find out more about the Industrial Strategy Challenge Fund here
For more Innovate UK videos subscribe to our YouTube channel here
Sign up for email notifications on funding, connections & support opportunities
Follow Innovate UK on Facebook
Connect with Innovate UK on Linkedin
2 comments
Comment by Daniel Dearing posted on
It’s interesting to know (according to Wikipedia) that the 30mph speed limit in built up areas was introduced back in 1956. The 70mph speed limit was then introduced for motorways in 1965. These speed limits must have been considered safe at the time, taking into account vehicle technology of the time.
I think it’s fair to say that vehicle technology has moved on very significantly since then in almost every aspect. Perhaps there could be a case for reviewing those speed limits now (more than 50 years on)
Comment by Jennie Martin posted on
If we're not envisaging AVs running on their own segregated network, then I'd like to see some research into to what extent pedestrians and other non-motorised modes factor speed limits into their decision making, before taking a view as to whether abandoning limits will be safe.